Connect
Align
Place
Invest
Amplify
Designed vs. Improvised Onboarding
Maps the difference between a repeatable, leadership-owned onboarding system and one that depends entirely on the manager a new hire happens to get.
Without This System
✕ Onboarding depends on which manager they get
✕ No one checks in until something goes wrong
✕ Misalignment surfaces at Month 3 - too late
✕ New hires form opinions in silence
✕ Average cost per failed hire: $38K-$75K
With This System
◆ Every hire gets the same designed experience
◆ Pulse checks at Day 5, 14, and 30
◆ Early-warning flags trigger at Day 10
◆ Manager owns the system - leadership sees the data
◆ Year-one retention becomes a design outcome, not a surprise
90-Day Onboarding Journey
Tracks one new hire through the full 90-day system across four phases — each with a defined owner, measurable checkpoint, and real-time status indicator.
✓Complete
All phase actions closed
→On Track
Progressing as planned
…In Progress
Active — not yet scored
!Watch
Flag triggered — action needed
✓
Days -7 to 0
CompleteWelcome packet, tech provisioned, buddy assigned, leadership welcome sent
Slack · Notion · Email
✓
Days 1–30
CompleteRole expectations signed, Day 5 pulse: 4.2/5, early-warning flag resolved Day 16, Day 30 review completed
Typeform · Calendar · Notion
→
Days 31–60
On TrackStretch assignment underway, peer feedback collected, Day 60 check-in scheduled
Asana · Notion · Zoom
…
Days 61–90
In ProgressGrowth pathway conversation pending, Day 90 readiness review scheduled with leadership
Notion · Bridges to Invest
Onboarding Health Metrics
Three measures that tell leadership whether the system is working: new hire sentiment, phase completion rates, and the dollar cost the system prevented.
Week 1 Pulse Score
Buddy connection strong. Questions asked proactively.
$38K
Estimated cost avoided — equivalent to one fully loaded mid-level exit.
This system caught the gap at Day 10 instead of Month 3.
Basis: recruiting fee (15–20% of salary)
+ 90-day productivity ramp loss
Source: SHRM Cost-Per-Hire Survey 2022
Early-Warning Detection
Shows when the system detected a risk signal and how quickly the manager resolved it.
Days -7 to 0 — Pre-Start · Complete
Day -7
System activated,
welcome sent
Day -3
Tech provisioned,
buddy assigned
Day 0
All clear —
ready to start
Days 1–30 · Complete
Day 5
Pulse: 4.2/5
No flags
Day 10
Role clarity
flag triggered
Day 30
Review complete
Continue: Yes
Days 31–60 · On Track
Day 31
Month 2 pulse:
4.4/5 — no flags
Day 45
Stretch assignment
on track
Day 55
Peer feedback
collected
Days 61–90 · In Progress
Day 75
Growth pathway
convo scheduled
Day 90
Readiness review
pending
System Actions Completed
The six critical actions this system ensures happen in every onboarding - each with a defined owner and the tool it lives in.
Leadership welcome from Managing Partner
Owner: Leadership · Email
Role expectations documented and signed
Owner: Manager · Notion
4/4 stakeholder relationships introduced
Owner: Manager · Zoom
Day 5 pulse: "Do you feel seen?" - 4.2/5
Owner: Manager · Typeform
Early-warning flag triggered Day 10 - resolved Day 16
Owner: Manager · Calendar
Day 30 review and growth pathway conversation
Owner: Manager + Leadership · Bridges to Invest
Day 60 check-in: role fit and contribution assessment
Owner: Manager · Notion
Day 90 readiness review and retention decision
Owner: Manager + Leadership · Bridges to Invest
12%
of employees say their company does a great job of onboarding — meaning 88% of new hires arrive into a system that leadership believes is inadequate.
Gallup State of the Global Workplace, 2023
What This System Caught
Riverside Advisory Group's system flagged a role clarity gap at Day 10 and the manager resolved it by Day 16. Without the infrastructure, that conversation doesn't happen — and what surfaces at Month 3 is disengagement, not a missed check-in.
82%
higher new hire retention
in companies with a
structured onboarding process
Brandon Hall Group
Onboarding Research, 2022
